<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org">
<title>Chest recent issues</title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org</link>
<description>Chest RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Chest</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0012-3692</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/895?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/896?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/898?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/903?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/904?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/911?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/919?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/925?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/931?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/938?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/947?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/955?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/963?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/969?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/974?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/981?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/990?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/996?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1001?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1009?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1017?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1027?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1033?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1037?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1044?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1051?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1056?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1066?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1069?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1074?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1080?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1088?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1092?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1103?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1106?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1106-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1107-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1108?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1108-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1109?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/4_suppl/43S?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.chestjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Chest</title>
<url>http://www.chestjournal.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/895?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, or Carbon Monoxide Protection?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/895?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owens, R. L., Yim-Yeh, S., Malhotra, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1728</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, or Carbon Monoxide Protection?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>896</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>895</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The "Obesity Paradox": Is Smoking/Lung Disease the Explanation?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavie, C. J., Ventura, H. O., Milani, R. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1673</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The "Obesity Paradox": Is Smoking/Lung Disease the Explanation?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>898</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/898?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prophylaxis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Changing Culture and Strategies to Trump Disease]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/898?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craven, D. E., Hjalmarson, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1735</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prophylaxis of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Changing Culture and Strategies to Trump Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>900</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>898</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management or Avoidance of Medical Malpractice Crises?: Time to Choose]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Studdert, D. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1857</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management or Avoidance of Medical Malpractice Crises?: Time to Choose]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>902</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/903?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/903?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rogers, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.134.5.903</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Second Opinion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>903</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>903</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/904?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Circulating Carbon Monoxide Level Is Elevated After Sleep in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/904?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity. This study aimed to determine circulating carbon monoxide (CO) levels, which have been suggested to be a marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with OSA.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Venous blood samples were obtained from 35 patients with OSA and 17 age-matched, healthy control subjects before and after polysomnography. Concentrations of venous CO and serum heme oxygenase (HO)-1 were determined by gas chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Circulating CO levels in OSA patients were significantly increased in the morning, but not in the evening. The change in CO level, which was defined as a gap between the presleep and postsleep CO levels, correlated with apnea-hypopnea index and hypoxia duration as a percentage of total sleep time. No difference was found in serum HO-1 levels between OSA patients and control subjects. Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) resulted in normalization of the postsleep CO level.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>The postsleep circulating CO level is helpful for assessing the clinical severity of OSA. Moreover, treatment of OSA with CPAP can potentially reduce the risk of the disease associated cardiovascular events.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kobayashi, M., Miyazawa, N., Takeno, M., Murakami, S., Kirino, Y., Okouchi, A., Kaneko, T., Ishigatsubo, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2904</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Circulating Carbon Monoxide Level Is Elevated After Sleep in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>910</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>904</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SLEEP MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/911?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Expression in Uvular Tissues Differs Between Snorers and Apneic Patients]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/911?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Inflammatory changes such as subepithelial edema and excessive inflammatory cell infiltration have been observed in uvular tissues of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) subjects. The levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- and interleukin-6 are elevated in the serum of apneic patients and have been proposed as mediators of muscle weakness. TNF- has been shown to affect diaphragm contractility in mice and rabbit <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Objectives:</I></st>
<p>To assess total and compartmental TNF- expression in uvular tissues of apneic and nonapneic patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Uvular tissues were collected from 14 snorers without sleep disorders breathing, 14 subjects with OSA (OSA 1 group) whose body mass index (BMI) was similar to that of snorers, and 12 additional obese OSA subjects (OSA 2 group) who underwent an uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. Sections were examined using immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. TNF- expression was evaluated in the musculus uvulae (MU), epithelial layer, and perimuscular tissues from proximal uvular sections.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>TNF- was more highly expressed in whole uvular protein extracts of apneic groups than in snorers ([mean &plusmn; SEM] snorers, 100.5 &plusmn; 3.0%; OSA 1 group, 127.1 &plusmn; 6.9%; OSA 2 group, 140.7 &plusmn; 11.0%; p = 0.01). In the muscular area, TNF- levels were higher in the more obese OSA subjects than in the other two groups (snorers, 100.3 &plusmn; 3%; OSA 1 group, 107.4 &plusmn; 0.7%; OSA 2 group, 124.1 &plusmn; 4.2%; p = 0.007). In the muscular area, TNF- was correlated with BMI, but no relationship was found with the apnea-hypopnea index.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>We conclude that MU is the major TNF- source in uvular tissue and that TNF- is more highly expressed in the heaviest OSA patients compared to less obese OSA patients and nonapneic snorers.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Loubaki, L., Jacques, E., Semlali, A., Biardel, S., Chakir, J., Series, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0886</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Expression in Uvular Tissues Differs Between Snorers and Apneic Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>918</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>911</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SLEEP MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/919?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Daytime Sleepiness Relates to Snoring Independent of the Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Women From the General Population]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/919?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Objectives:</I></st>
<p>The aim was to investigate the significance of snoring and sleep apnea on daytime symptoms in a population-based sample of women.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Method:</I></st>
<p>From the general population, 400 women aged 20 to 70 years were randomly selected, with oversampling of habitually snoring women. The women were investigated using full-night polysomnography and a questionnaire. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was calculated, and women who acknowledged snoring loudly and disturbingly often or very often were considered habitual snorers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Habitual snoring was independently related to excessive daytime sleepiness (odds ratio [OR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31 to 3.99), to falling asleep involuntarily during the day (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.21), to waking up unrefreshed (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.30 to 3.52), to daytime fatigue (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.54 to 4.99), and to a dry mouth on awakening (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.27) after adjustment for AHI, age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, total sleep time, percentage of slow-wave sleep, and percentage of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. An AHI &ge; 15/h was only related to a dry mouth on awakening after adjustment for snoring, age, BMI, smoking, total sleep time, percentage of slow-wave sleep, and percentage of REM sleep (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.14 to 4.40). An AHI of 5 to 15/h was not related to any daytime symptom.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Excessive daytime sleepiness and daytime fatigue are related to habitual snoring independent of the apnea-hypopnea frequency, age, obesity, smoking, and sleep parameters in a population-based sample of women, but not to the AHI. This indicates that snoring is an independent cause of excess daytime sleepiness and not merely a proxy for sleep apnea.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Svensson, M., Franklin, K. A., Theorell-Haglow, J., Lindberg, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0847</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Daytime Sleepiness Relates to Snoring Independent of the Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Women From the General Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>924</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>919</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SLEEP MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/925?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Obesity Paradox in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/925?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Cardiac events are the predominant cause of late mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In these patients, mortality decreases with increasing body mass index (BMI). COPD is identified as a cardiac risk factor, which preferentially affects underweight individuals. Whether or not COPD explains the obesity paradox in PAD patients is unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We studied 2,392 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at one teaching institution. Patients were classified according to COPD status and BMIs (<I>ie</I>, underweight, normal, overweight, and obese), and the relationship between these variables and all-cause mortality was determined using a Cox regression analysis. The median follow-up period was 4.37 years (interquartile range, 1.98 to 8.47 years).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>The overall mortality rates among underweight, normal, overweight, and obese patients were 54%, 50%, 40%, and 31%, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). The distribution of COPD severity classes showed an increased prevalence of moderate-to-severe COPD in underweight patients. In the entire population, BMI (continuous) was associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 0.98). In addition, patients who were classified as being underweight were at increased risk for mortality (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.01). However, after adjusting for COPD severity the relationship was no longer significant (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.93).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>The excess mortality among underweight patients was largely explained by the overrepresentation of individuals with moderate-to-severe COPD. COPD may in part explain the "obesity paradox" in the PAD population.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galal, W., van Gestel, Y. R. B. M., Hoeks, S. E., Sin, D. D., Winkel, T. A., Bax, J. J., Verhagen, H., Awara, A. M. M., Klein, J., van Domburg, R. T., Poldermans, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0418</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Obesity Paradox in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>930</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>925</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/931?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessment of Regional Progression of Pulmonary Emphysema With CT Densitometry]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/931?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Lung densitometry is an effective method to assess overall progression of emphysema, but generally the location of the progression is not estimated. We hypothesized that progression of emphysema is the result of extension from affected areas toward less affected areas in the lung. To test this hypothesis, a method was developed to assess emphysema severity at different levels in the lungs in order to estimate regional changes.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Fifty subjects with emphysema due to <SUB>1</SUB>-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) [AATD deficiency of phenotype PiZZ (PiZ) group] and 16 subjects with general emphysema (general emphysema without phenotype PiZZ [non-PiZ] group) were scanned with CT at baseline and after 30 months. Densitometry was performed in 12 axial partitions of equal volumes. To indicate predominant location, craniocaudal locality was defined as the slope in the plot of densities against partitions. Regional progression of emphysema was calculated after volume correction, and its slope identifies the area of predominant progression. The hypothesis was tested by investigating the correlation between predominant location and predominant progression.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>As expected, the PiZ patients showed more basal emphysema than the non-PiZ group (craniocaudal locality, &ndash; 40.0 g/L vs &ndash; 6.2 g/L). Overall progression rate in PiZ patients was lower than in non-PiZ subjects. A significant correlation was found between craniocaudal locality and progression slope in PiZ subjects (<I>R</I> = 0.566, p &lt; 0.001). In the non-PiZ group, no correlation was found.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>In the PiZ group, the more emphysema is distributed basally, the more progression was found in the basal area. This finding suggests that emphysema due to AATD spreads out from affected areas.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bakker, M. E., Putter, H., Stolk, J., Shaker, S. B., Piitulainen, E., Russi, E. W., Stoel, B. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0512</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessment of Regional Progression of Pulmonary Emphysema With CT Densitometry]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>937</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>931</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COPD</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/938?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Continuous Aspiration of Subglottic Secretions in the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Postoperative Period of Major Heart Surgery]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/938?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Objective:</I></st>
<p>Aspiration of endotracheal secretions is a major step in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). We compared conventional and continuous aspiration of subglottic secretions (CASS) procedures in ventilated patients after major heart surgery (MHS).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Materials and methods:</I></st>
<p>Randomized comparison during a 2-year period.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>A total of 714 patients were randomized (24 patients were excluded from the study; 359 CASS patients; 331 control subjects). The results for CASS patients and control subjects (per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis) were as follows: VAP incidence, 3.6% vs 5.3% (p = 0.2) and 3.8% vs 5.1%, respectively; incidence density, 17.9 vs 27.6 episodes per 1,000 days of mechanical ventilation (MV) [p = 0.18] and 18.9 vs 28.7 episodes per 1,000 days of MV, respectively; hospital antibiotic use in daily defined doses (DDDs), 1,213 vs 1,932 (p &lt; 0.001) and 1,392 vs 1,932, respectively (p &lt; 0.001). In patients who had received mechanical ventilation for &gt; 48 h, the comparisons of CASS patients and control subjects were as follows: VAP incidence, 26.7% vs 47.5% (p = 0.04), respectively; incidence density, 31.5 vs 51.6 episodes per 1,000 days of MV, respectively (p = 0.03); median length of ICU stay, 7 vs 16.5 days (p = 0.01), respectively; hospital antibiotic use, 1,206 vs 1,877 DDD (p &lt; 0.001), respectively; <I>Clostridium difficile</I>-associated diarrhea, 6.7% vs 12.5% (p = 0.3), respectively; and overall mortality rate, 44.4% vs 52.5% (p = 0.3), respectively. Reintubation increased the risk of VAP (relative risk [RR], 6.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20 to 16.60; p &lt; 0.001), while CASS was the only significant protective factor (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.99; p = 0.04). No complications related to CASS were observed. The cost of the CASS tube was 9 vs 1.5  for the conventional tube.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>CASS is a safe procedure that reduces the use of antimicrobial agents in the overall population and the incidence of VAP in patients who are at risk. CASS use should be encouraged, at least in patients undergoing MHS.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bouza, E., Perez, M. J., Munoz, P., Rincon, C., Barrio, J. M., Hortal, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0103</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Continuous Aspiration of Subglottic Secretions in the Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Postoperative Period of Major Heart Surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>946</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>938</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PNEUMONIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/947?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adrenal Response in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Impact on Outcomes and Disease Severity]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/947?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>High cortisol levels are frequent in patients with severe infections. However, the predictive value of total cortisol and of the presence of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains to be thoroughly evaluated. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of adrenal response in patients with severe CAP admitted to the ICU.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Baseline and postcorticotropin cortisol levels C-reactive protein (CRP), d-dimer, clinical variables, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II, and CURB-65 (confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, BP, age &ge; 65 years) scores were measured in the first 24 h. Results are shown as median (interquartile range [IQR]). The major outcome measure was hospital mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Seventy-two patients with severe CAP admitted to the ICU were evaluated. Baseline cortisol levels were 18.1 &micro;g/dL (IQR, 14.4 to 26.7 &micro;g/dL), and the difference between baseline and postcorticotropin cortisol after 250 &micro;g of corticotropin was 19 &micro;g/dL (IQR, 12.8 to 27 &micro;g/dL). Baseline cortisol levels presented positive correlations with scores of disease severity, including CURB-65, APACHE II, and SOFA (p &lt; 0.05). Cortisol levels in nonsurvivors were higher than in survivors. CIRCI was diagnosed in 29 patients (40.8%). In univariate analysis, baseline cortisol, CURB-65, and APACHE II were predictors of death. The discriminative ability of baseline cortisol (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.90; best cutoff for cortisol, 25.7 &micro;g/dL) for in-hospital mortality was better than APACHE II, CURB-65, SOFA, d-dimer, or CRP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Baseline cortisol levels are better predictors of severity and outcome in severe CAP than postcorticotropin cortisol or routinely measured laboratory parameters or scores as APACHE II, SOFA, and CURB-65.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Salluh, J. I. F., Bozza, F. A., Soares, M., Verdeal, J. C. R., Castro-Faria-Neto, H. C., Lapa e Silva, J. R., Bozza, P. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1382</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adrenal Response in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Impact on Outcomes and Disease Severity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>954</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>947</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PNEUMONIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/955?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence, Etiology, Timing, and Risk Factors for Clinical Failure in Hospitalized Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/955?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>The etiology of clinical failure in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) may be related or unrelated to pulmonary infection. The objective of this study was to define the incidence, etiology, timing, and risk factors associated with clinical failures related to CAP vs those unrelated to CAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Observational retrospective study of consecutive CAP patients. All patients who experienced clinical failure were identified. Cases were presented to a review committee that defined, by consensus, etiology, timing, and risk factors for clinical failures related to CAP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Among 500 patients who were enrolled in the study, clinical failure was identified in 67 (13%). Clinical failure was related to CAP in 54 patients (81%). The most common etiologies for clinical failure related to CAP were severe sepsis (33%), acute myocardial infarction (28%), and progressive pneumonia (19%). All cases of severe sepsis occurred in the first 72 h of hospitalization. The most common etiology for clinical failure unrelated to CAP was the development of hospital-acquired pneumonia (45%). At the time of hospital admission, factors associated with clinical failure related to CAP were advanced age, congestive heart failure, hypotension, abnormal gas exchange, acidosis, hypothermia, thrombocytopenia, and pleural effusion.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>The development of severe sepsis early during hospitalization is the primary etiology for clinical failure related to CAP. To achieve early treatment intervention, physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for severe sepsis in hospitalized patients with CAP. To decrease the number of clinical failures unrelated to CAP, interventions need to be developed at the local level to improve the processes of care for patients with pneumonia.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aliberti, S., Amir, A., Peyrani, P., Mirsaeidi, M., Allen, M., Moffett, B. K., Myers, J., Shaib, F., Cirino, M., Bordon, J., Blasi, F., Ramirez, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0334</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence, Etiology, Timing, and Risk Factors for Clinical Failure in Hospitalized Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>962</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>955</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PNEUMONIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/963?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Antimicrobial Therapy Escalation and Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia: A Single-Center Experience]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/963?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Patients with health-care&ndash;associated pneumonia (HCAP) are frequently infected with a resistant pathogen and receive inappropriate empiric antibiotics (<I>ie</I>, pathogens resistant to administered treatment). Initial inappropriate treatment has been shown to increase hospital mortality. It is not known whether escalation in response to culture results mitigates this risk.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We identified patients admitted with a culture-positive pneumonia between January 2003 and December 2005. HCAP patients met one or more of the following criteria indicating ongoing contact with the health-care system: recent hospitalization (&le; 12 months), admission from a nursing home, immunosuppression, or long-term dialysis. We compared survivors to nonsurvivors among those patients with HCAP still hospitalized beyond 48 h.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Of 431 HCAP patients, 396 patients (92%) were alive and still hospitalized beyond 48 h. The crude mortality rate was 21.5%. Compared to survivors, nonsurvivors were significantly more likely to be treated with inappropriate empiric antibiotics (37.6% vs 24.1%, p = 0.013). Although mortality was higher among patients receiving inappropriate than appropriate therapy (30.0% vs 18.3%, p = 0.013), this difference was more pronounced among nonbacteremic patients (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 4.75) than bacteremic patients (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.41 to 3.57). In a logistic regression, inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment among nonbacteremic patients was independently associated with mortality (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.46 to 5.67); treatment escalation did not attenuate the risk of death.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>Among HCAP patients alive and hospitalized beyond 48 h, hospital mortality was high and, in the absence of bacteremia, greater with initial inappropriate antibiotic treatment. Despite subsequent escalation, initial inappropriate antibiotic choice nearly tripled the risk of hospital death.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zilberberg, M. D., Shorr, A. F., Micek, S. T., Mody, S. H., Kollef, M. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0842</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Antimicrobial Therapy Escalation and Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia: A Single-Center Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>968</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>963</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PNEUMONIA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/969?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pressure Characteristics of Mechanical Ventilation and Incidence of Pneumothorax Before and After the Implementation of Protective Lung Strategies in the Management of Pediatric Patients With Severe ARDS]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/969?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Objective:</I></st>
<p>To compare pressure characteristics of mechanical ventilation and their impact on pediatric patients with severe ARDS in the pre-protective lung strategy (PLS) and post-PLS eras.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Medical records of 33 patients admitted to our pediatric ICU with ARDS from 1992 through 1994 (pre-PLS) and 52 patients with ARDS admitted from 2000 through 2003 (post-PLS) were retrospectively reviewed.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Patient age and gender distribution were identical in both eras. Fifty-five percent of the patients in the pre-PLS era had pneumothorax, compared to 17% in the post-PLS era (p &lt; 0.05). Overall mortality rates for patients in the pre-PLS and post-PLS eras were 42% and 25%, respectively (p = 0.09; not significant). Mean duration of exposure to peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) values &gt; 40 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O was significantly longer in the pre-PLS era than in the post-PLS era. Pre-PLS patients with pneumothorax received mean maximum PIP of 72 &plusmn; 17 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, mean maximum positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 20 &plusmn; 5 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, and maximum mean airway pressure (MAP) of 46 &plusmn; 8 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, while patients in the post-PLS era required mean maximum PIP of 42 &plusmn; 2 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, mean maximum PEEP of 14 &plusmn; 2 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, and maximum MAP of 30 &plusmn; 6 cm H<SUB>2</SUB>O, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 for all pressure parameters). There were no significant differences in mechanical ventilation pressure characteristics among patients who did not have pneumothorax during their course of management in both eras.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>A significantly more aggressive use of ventilator pressure characteristics distinguished the pre-PLS era from the post-PLS era, and was found to be associated with a markedly higher incidence of pneumothorax. Outcome in both eras did not differ significantly, presumably due to insufficient statistical power.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miller, M. P., Sagy, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0743</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pressure Characteristics of Mechanical Ventilation and Incidence of Pneumothorax Before and After the Implementation of Protective Lung Strategies in the Management of Pediatric Patients With Severe ARDS]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>973</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>969</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/974?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Obesity and Pulmonary Complications in Critically Injured Adults]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/974?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Pulmonary complications following injury significantly contribute to subsequent mortality. Obese patients have preexisting risk factors for pulmonary complications, and are at risk for these complications following elective surgery. Whether or not obesity contributes to pulmonary complications after critical injury is poorly understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of critically injured adults requiring at least 48 h of intensive care was performed. Patients were classified into the following body mass index groups: &le; 18.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (underweight); 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (normal); 25 to 29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (overweight); 30.0 to 39.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (obese); and &ge; 40.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (severely obese). Outcomes included the rates of ARDS and pneumonia, the placement of a tracheostomy tube, and in-hospital mortality rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>A total of 1,291 patients were available for analysis, and 30% of these patients were classified as either obese or severely obese. The age-, gender-, and severity-adjusted rate of ARDS was lower in severely obese patients (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.99) compared to normal weight patients. The rates of pneumonia (37%), tracheostomy (10%), and in-hospital mortality (11%) did not differ among the groups. Despite no difference in pulmonary complications, the severely obese group had an ICU length of stay that was 4.8 days (95% CI, 1.8 to 7.7 days) longer than the normal weight group.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>Obesity does not appear to be an independent risk factor for increased pulmonary complications after critical injury, but severely obese patients are likely to require longer ICU stays.<I>Trial registration:</I> Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00170560</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dossett, L. A., Heffernan, D., Lightfoot, M., Collier, B., Diaz, J. J., Sawyer, R. G., May, A. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0079</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Obesity and Pulmonary Complications in Critically Injured Adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>980</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>974</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/981?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Population Pharmacodynamic Model of Bronchodilator Response to Inhaled Albuterol in Children and Adults With Asthma]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/981?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Because interpatient variability in bronchodilation from inhaled albuterol is large and clinically important, we characterized the albuterol dose/response relationship by pharmacodynamic modeling and quantified variability.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Eighty-one patients with asthma (24% African American [AA]; 8 to 65 years old; baseline FEV<SUB>1</SUB>, 40 to 80% of predicted) received 180 &micro;g of albuterol from a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), and then 90 &micro;g every 15 min until maximum improvement or 540 &micro;g was administered; all then received 2.5 mg of nebulized albuterol. FEV<SUB>1</SUB> was measured 15 min after each dose. The population cumulative dose/response data were fitted with a sigmoid maximum effect of albuterol (Emax) [maximum percentage of predicted FEV<SUB>1</SUB> effect] model by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The influence of covariates on maximum percentage of predicted FEV<SUB>1</SUB> reached after albuterol administration (Rmax) and cumulative dose of albuterol required to bring about 50% of maximum effect of albuterol (ED<SUB>50</SUB>) and differences between AA and white patients were explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>ED<SUB>50</SUB> was 141 &micro;g, and Emax was 24.0%. Coefficients of variation for ED<SUB>50</SUB> and Emax were 40% and 56%, respectively. Ethnicity was a statistically significant covariate (p &lt; 0.05). AA and white patients reached 82.4% and 91.9% of predicted FEV<SUB>1</SUB>, respectively (p = 0.0004); and absolute improvement in percentage of predicted FEV<SUB>1</SUB> was 16.6% in AA patients vs 26.7% in white patients (p &lt; 0.0003). There were no baseline characteristic differences between AA and white patients. Nebulized albuterol increased FEV<SUB>1</SUB> &ge; 200 mL in 21% of participants. Heart rate and BP were unchanged from baseline after maximal albuterol doses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Our model predicts that 180 &micro;g of albuterol by MDI produces a 14.4% increase in percentage of predicted FEV<SUB>1</SUB> over baseline (11.7% in AA patients, and 17.5% in white patients). Emax varies widely between asthmatic patients. AA patients are less responsive to maximal doses of inhaled albuterol than white patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake, K., Madabushi, R., Derendorf, H., Lima, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2991</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Population Pharmacodynamic Model of Bronchodilator Response to Inhaled Albuterol in Children and Adults With Asthma]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>989</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>981</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ASTHMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/990?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurement Is Useful for the Exclusion of Nonasthmatic Eosinophilic Bronchitis in Patients With Chronic Cough]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/990?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB) is an important cause of chronic cough, and it can be diagnosed by an induced-sputum (IS) examination. However, an IS examination is a complex and time-consuming procedure, and it has limited clinical application. This study aimed to evaluate the role of exhaled nitric oxide (NO) for the investigation of chronic cough, especially of NAEB.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Two hundred eleven nonsmoking patients with a cough lasting &gt; 3 weeks were enrolled in the study. The patients were examined and investigated with conventional diagnostic tools, including an IS examination. Exhaled NO was measured by a chemoluminescent analyzer.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>One hundred seventeen patients with adequate IS results were analyzed: asthma, n = 14; NAEB, n = 21; and "others," n = 82. Exhaled NO and IS eosinophils were significantly higher in the asthma group and NAEB group than in the others group. Exhaled NO and IS eosinophils were significantly correlated in the asthma and NAEB groups. In the nonasthmatic group, the sensitivity and specificity of exhaled NO for detecting NAEB, using 31.7 parts per billion as the exhaled NO cutoff point, were 86% and 76%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 47% and 95%, respectively, and positive and negative likelihood ratios were 3.51 and 0.19, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>We concluded that exhaled NO measurement may be useful as part of the initial evaluation for chronic cough, especially for the exclusion of NAEB. A low level of exhaled NO suggested little likelihood of NAEB for the nonasthmatic patients with chronic cough.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oh, M.-J., Lee, J.-Y., Lee, B.-J., Choi, D.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-2541</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exhaled Nitric Oxide Measurement Is Useful for the Exclusion of Nonasthmatic Eosinophilic Bronchitis in Patients With Chronic Cough]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>995</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>990</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COUGH</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/996?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Children of Aymara and European Ancestry at High Altitude]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/996?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Invasive studies suggest that healthy children living at high altitude display pulmonary hypertension, but the data to support this assumption are sparse. Nitric oxide (NO) synthesized by the respiratory epithelium regulates pulmonary artery pressure, and its synthesis was reported to be increased in Aymara high-altitude dwellers. We hypothesized that pulmonary artery pressure will be lower in Aymara children than in children of European ancestry at high altitude, and that this will be related to increased respiratory NO. We therefore compared pulmonary artery pressure and exhaled NO (a marker of respiratory epithelial NO synthesis) between large groups of healthy children of Aymara (n = 200; mean &plusmn; SD age, 9.5 &plusmn; 3.6 years) and European ancestry (n = 77) living at high altitude (3,600 to 4,000 m). We also studied a group of European children (n = 29) living at low altitude. The systolic right ventricular to right atrial pressure gradient in the Aymara children was normal, even though significantly higher than the gradient measured in European children at low altitude (22.5 &plusmn; 6.1 mm Hg vs 17.7 &plusmn; 3.1 mm Hg, p &lt; 0.001). In children of European ancestry studied at high altitude, the pressure gradient was 33% higher than in the Aymara children (30.0 &plusmn; 5.3 mm Hg vs 22.5 &plusmn; 6.1 mm Hg, p &lt; 0.0001). In contrast to what was expected, exhaled NO tended to be lower in Aymara children than in European children living at the same altitude (12.4 &plusmn; 8.8 parts per billion [ppb] vs 16.1 &plusmn; 11.1 ppb, p = 0.06) and was not related to pulmonary artery pressure in either group. Aymara children are protected from hypoxic pulmonary hypertension at high altitude. This protection does not appear to be related to increased respiratory NO synthesis.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuber, T., Sartori, C., Salmon, C. S., Hutter, D., Thalmann, S., Turini, P., Jayet, P.-Y., Schwab, M., Sartori-Cucchia, C., Villena, M., Scherrer, U., Allemann, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0854</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Children of Aymara and European Ancestry at High Altitude]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1000</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>996</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY HYPERTENSION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1001?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increased Expression of CD16, CD69, and Very Late Antigen-1 on Blood Monocytes in Active Sarcoidosis]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1001?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Different types of immune cells are involved in the formation of granulomas, a hallmark of pulmonary sarcoidosis. Proinflammatory monocytes are activated circulating monocytes thought to be related to the initial events of granuloma formation. We tested the hypothesis that peripheral blood monocytes in patients with active pulmonary sarcoidosis have an activated phenotype and, secondly, that measuring this activation status can provide a new tool for monitoring disease activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Blood was collected of 23 steroid-naive patients presenting with pulmonary sarcoidosis and 10 healthy control subjects. Expression of CD16 (Fc- type III receptor), CD69 (a general activation marker of cells of the hematopoietic lineage), and the integrin very late antigen (VLA)-1 (on interaction with extracellular matrix compounds mediates cell adhesion) was measured by flow cytometry.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Percentages of monocytes expressing CD16, CD69, and VLA-1 in patients vs control subjects were 56.2 &plusmn; 4.1% vs 12.2 &plusmn; 2.4% (p &lt; 0.0001), 87.3 &plusmn; 2.1% vs 8.6 &plusmn; 3.3% (p &lt; 0.0001), and 66.5 &plusmn; 3.6% vs 11.2 &plusmn; 2.3% (p &lt; 0.0001), respectively. Moreover, the CD69<sup>+</sup>VLA-1<sup>+</sup> monocyte subset, abundantly present at disease presentation, was found to decrease to normal levels during follow-up with disease remission.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Peripheral blood monocytes from patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis show a highly activated phenotype. Phenotyping circulating monocytes might be a promising tool for monitoring sarcoidosis disease activity but needs further investigation.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heron, M., Grutters, J. C., van Velzen-Blad, H., Veltkamp, M., Claessen, A. M. E., van den Bosch, J. M. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0443</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increased Expression of CD16, CD69, and Very Late Antigen-1 on Blood Monocytes in Active Sarcoidosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1008</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1001</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY HYPERTENSION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1009?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Discordance in Spirometric Interpretations Using Three Commonly Used Reference Equations vs National Health and Nutrition Examination Study III]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1009?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Spirometry plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary diseases. The accurate interpretation of spirometric data depends on comparison to a reference population to identify abnormalities in ventilatory function. National guidelines recommended the use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) III data set as the preferred reference population for those persons 8 to 80 years of age in the United States.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Objectives:</I></st>
<p>To determine the effect of using NHANES III reference equations, compared to those of Crapo et al (Crapo), Knudson et al (Knudson), or Morris et al (Morris), on spirometric interpretations in non-Hispanic white patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We conducted a cross-sectional study of all white patients undergoing spirometry testing at our hospital from January 2000 through May 2007. Patients were classified as normal, restricted, obstructed, or mixed, based on the American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines, using the Crapo, Knudson, Morris, and NHANES III prediction equations. Differences in the classifications based on the reference data set were evaluated.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>At total of 8,733 subjects (62.4% male subjects) were identified, with a mean age of 53 years. Discordance was most common when the results from prediction equations by Knudson and Morris were compared to those of NHANES III (45.5% and 35.3%, respectively). Diagnostic recategorizations occurred less frequently when the prediction equations by Crapo were compared with those of NHANES III (15.9%). Relative to NHANES III, the prediction equations by Knudson, Crapo, and Morris tend to overclassify obstruction and underclassify restriction.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>There is significant discordance between the prediction equations put forth by Crapo, Knudson, Morris, and the NHANES III. Our data suggest that the diagnostic reclassification of many patients undergoing pulmonary function testing will occur when ATS/ERS guidelines are implemented. Pulmonologists and other physicians interpreting spirometry need to be aware of the presence and nature of these changes.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Collen, J., Greenburg, D., Holley, A., King, C. S., Hnatiuk, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0614</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Discordance in Spirometric Interpretations Using Three Commonly Used Reference Equations vs National Health and Nutrition Examination Study III]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1016</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1009</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTING</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1017?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Image-Guided Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Lung Lesions: A Phantom Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1017?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Ultrathin bronchoscopy guided by virtual bronchoscopy (VB) techniques show promise for the diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions. In a phantom study, we evaluated a new real-time, VB-based, image-guided system for guiding the bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung lesions and compared its performance to that of standard bronchoscopy practice.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>Twelve bronchoscopists of varying experience levels participated in the study. The task was to use an ultrathin bronchoscope and a biopsy forceps to localize 10 synthetically created lesions situated at varying airway depths. For route planning and guidance, the bronchoscopists employed either standard bronchoscopy practice or the real-time image-guided system. Outcome measures were biopsy site position error, which was defined as the distance from the forceps contact point to the ground-truth lesion boundary, and localization success, which was defined as a site identification having a biopsy site position error of &le; 5 mm.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Mean (&plusmn; SD) localization success more than doubled from 43 &plusmn; 16% using standard practice to 94 &plusmn; 7.9% using image guidance (p &lt; 10<sup>&ndash;15</sup> [McNemar paired test]). The mean biopsy site position error dropped from 9.7 &plusmn; 9.1 mm for standard practice to 2.2 &plusmn; 2.3 mm for image guidance. For standard practice, localization success decreased from 56% for generation 3 to 4 lesions to 31% for generation 6 to 8 lesions and also decreased from 51% for lesions on a carina vs 23% for lesions situated away from a carina. These factors were far less pronounced when using image guidance, as follows: success for generation 3 to 4 lesions, 97%; success for generation 6 to 8 lesions, 91%; success for lesions on a carina, 98%; success for lesions away from a carina, 86%. Bronchoscopist experience did not significantly affect performance using the image-guided system.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>Real-time, VB-based image guidance can potentially far exceed standard bronchoscopy practice for enabling the bronchoscopic biopsy of peripheral lung lesions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Merritt, S. A., Gibbs, J. D., Yu, K.-C., Patel, V., Rai, L., Cornish, D. C., Bascom, R., Higgins, W. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0603</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Image-Guided Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Lung Lesions: A Phantom Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1026</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1017</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1027?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Drug Lymphocyte Stimulation Test in the Diagnosis of Adverse Reactions to Antituberculosis Drugs]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1027?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Tuberculosis (TB) is a worldwide infectious disease. Recently, standard therapy has become very effective for treating patients with TB; however, as a result of this powerful regimen, serious side effects have become an important problem. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of the drug lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) to determine anti-TB drugs causing side effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Method:</I></st>
<p>Four hundred thirty-six patients with TB were admitted to our hospital for treatment between January 2002 and August 2007. DLST was performed in patients who had certain adverse drug reactions during TB treatment. The causative drug was identified by the drug provocation test (DPT). The tested drugs were mainly isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB) and pyrazinamide (PZA).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Of 436 patients, 69 patients (15.8%) had certain adverse drug reactions to anti-TB drugs. Of the 261 agents that underwent the DLST and DPT, 28 agents (10.7%) in 20 patients (28.9%) were positive by DLST, and 67 agents (25.7%) in 46 patients (66.6%) were identified as causative drugs by DPT. The sensitivity of DLST was only 14.9% for all drugs (INH, 14.3%; RIF, 13.6%; EMB, 14.3%; PZA, 0%).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusions:</I></st>
<p>DLST offers little contribution to the detection of causative agents in patients with adverse anti-TB drug reactions.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzuki, Y., Miwa, S., Shirai, M., Ohba, H., Murakami, M., Fujita, K., Suda, T., Nakamura, H., Hayakawa, H., Chida, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.07-3088</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Drug Lymphocyte Stimulation Test in the Diagnosis of Adverse Reactions to Antituberculosis Drugs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1032</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1027</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>TUBERCULOSIS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1033?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcomes of Emergency Department Patients Treated for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1033?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>International guidelines for the management of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) vary, and there is growing opinion that more patients could be successfully managed with observation alone. There is little published evidence detailing the outcomes of emergency department (ED) patients who have been treated for PSP. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical outcomes for patients with PSP.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>This was a retrospective cohort study that was conducted by explicit medical record review that investigated adult patients with PSP who had been treated at two urban teaching hospital EDs from 1996 to 2005. The data collected included demographics, clinical data at presentation, and outcome data. The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients who were successfully treated with the initial management strategy (<I>ie</I>, conservative, aspiration, and tube thoracostomy). Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>A total of 203 episodes of PSP in 154 patients (70% male; median age, 24 years) was identified. PSP size ranged from 5 to 100%. Ninety-one PSP patients (45%) were treated with outpatient observation, 48 patients (24%) were treated with aspiration, and 64 patients (31%) were treated with tube thoracostomy. In total, the conditions of 79% of patients (82 of 91 patients) who were treated with observation resolved without additional intervention. Aspiration was successful in 50% of cases (24 of 48 cases) where it was attempted; the conditions of 73% of PSP patients who were treated with tube thoracostomy (47 of 64) resolved without additional intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>These data suggest that observation alone is an effective initial treatment strategy for selected patients with PSP. They support the inclusion of an observation arm in planned prospective studies comparing different management approaches.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly, A.-M., Kerr, D., Clooney, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0910</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcomes of Emergency Department Patients Treated for Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1036</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1033</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPONTANEOUS PNEUMOTHORAX</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1037?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Eosinophil Progenitors in Airway Diseases: Clinical Implications]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1037?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Asthma, allergic rhinitis, nasal polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and related forms of upper and lower airway diseases are often characterized by eosinophilic and basophilic inflammation, involving systemic processes. Eosinophil/basophil (Eo/B) lineage-committed progenitor cells in cord blood, peripheral blood, bone marrow, lung tissue, and sputum are up-regulated in the above conditions, and respond to allergen and other stimuli with increased differentiative and migratory capacity. A considerable body of evidence now exists showing that activation of such Eo/B-selective hemopoietic processes is not only associated with the onset and maintenance of allergic inflammation in atopic adults, but also with the development of the allergic diathesis. Moreover, eosinophilopoietic processes within hemopoietic compartments and, importantly, at mucosal tissue sites during an allergic inflammatory response provide novel targets for the treatment of allergy as a systemic process and disease.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denburg, J. A., Keith, P. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0485</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Eosinophil Progenitors in Airway Diseases: Clinical Implications]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1043</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1037</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>TRANSLATING BASIC RESEARCH INTO CLINICAL PRACTICE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1044?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice and the Chest Physician]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1044?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The US malpractice system is based on tort law, which holds physicians responsible for not harming patients intentionally or through negligence. Malpractice claims are brought against physicians from most medical disciplines in proportion to their numbers in practice and to the frequency with which they perform procedures. Claims against chest physicians most commonly allege injuries caused by the following: (1) errors in diagnosis, (2) improper performance of procedures, (3) failure to supervise or monitor care, (4) medication errors, and (5) failure to recognize the complications of treatment. Most of these injuries occur in hospitals, and many of the injured patients die. The social goals of the medical malpractice system include the following: (1) compensating patients injured through negligence, (2) exacting corrective justice, and (3) deterring unsafe practices by creating an economic incentive to take greater precautions. Some patients injured through negligence are compensated, but most are not. Claims are brought against some negligent physicians but also some who are not negligent, and being negligent does not guarantee that a claim will be brought. The deterrent effect of medical malpractice is unproven, and the malpractice system may prompt defensive medicine and increase health-care costs. And by stressing individual accountability, it conflicts with a systems-oriented approach to reducing medical errors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luce, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0697</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice and the Chest Physician]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1050</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1044</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>COMMENTARY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1051?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Basics of Medical Malpractice: A Primer on Navigating the System]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1051?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Medical malpractice with its associated costs, including insurance premiums, impact on practice, consequences for career and insurability, and emotional toll, is a reality of practicing medicine in the United States. Understanding the types of claims that may be asserted, the issues to consider when securing insurance coverage, how to manage the cost of insurance, the nuances of the claims process, and the implications of the claims process are critical to the successful management of this aspect of medical practice. This article provides a guide for practicing physicians on the legal, financial, and practical considerations involved.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nepps, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0186</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Basics of Medical Malpractice: A Primer on Navigating the System]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1055</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1051</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>TOPICS IN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1056?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spontaneous Hemothorax: A Comprehensive Review]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1056?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ali, H. A., Lippmann, M., Mundathaje, U., Khaleeq, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0725</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spontaneous Hemothorax: A Comprehensive Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1065</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1056</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SPECIAL FEATURES</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1066?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gas Embolism Following Bronchoscopic Argon Plasma Coagulation: A Case Series]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1066?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Thermal ablation using argon plasma coagulation (APC) is a commonly used modality in the bronchoscopic management of central airway obstruction and hemoptysis. In experienced hands, APC is considered to be a relatively safe tool. Reported complications associated with APC use are rare and include hemorrhage, airway perforation, or airway fires. Systemic gas embolism has been reported with APC during laparoscopic hepatic surgeries, and we have reported one case of systemic gas embolism with cardiovascular collapse in the past. We now report the first case series of systemic, life-threatening gas embolism occurring as a complication of bronchoscopic application of APC.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reddy, C., Majid, A., Michaud, G., Feller-Kopman, D., Eberhardt, R., Herth, F., Ernst, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0474</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gas Embolism Following Bronchoscopic Argon Plasma Coagulation: A Case Series]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1069</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1066</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SELECTED REPORTS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1069?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anthracofibrosis, Bronchial Stenosis With Overlying Anthracotic Mucosa: Possibly a New Occupational Lung Disorder: A Series of Seven Cases From One UK Hospital]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1069?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Anthracofibrosis, which was recently defined as bronchial stenosis with overlying anthracotic mucosa, has been infrequently reported in Asia as a complication of tuberculosis (TB). It has not been reported in the United Kingdom or the United States, or, to our knowledge, in non-Asian patients. We have identified seven cases of patients presenting to a single teaching hospital in the northwest of England over a 13-year period. Only one patient had a history of TB, but six of the seven patients had a history of occupational dust exposure, including one patient with pneumoconiosis. It is possible that anthracofibrosis is an exaggerated endobronchial form of the much more common condition of anthracosis in coal miners and other workers who have been exposed to mineral dusts. Our study suggests that this is essentially a benign condition, although it may progress very slowly, leading to gradually progressive bronchial stenosis. The diagnosis is important because most patients have clinical, radiologic, and bronchoscopic changes that are highly suspicious of malignancy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wynn, G. J., Turkington, P. M., O'Driscoll, B. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0814</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anthracofibrosis, Bronchial Stenosis With Overlying Anthracotic Mucosa: Possibly a New Occupational Lung Disorder: A Series of Seven Cases From One UK Hospital]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1073</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1069</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>SELECTED REPORTS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1074?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dyspnea, Chest Pain, and Altered Mental Status in a 33-Year-Old Carpenter]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1074?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham, B. B., Burnham, E. L., Janssen, J. S., Janssen, W. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1135</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dyspnea, Chest Pain, and Altered Mental Status in a 33-Year-Old Carpenter]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1079</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1074</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CASE RECORDS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1080?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 65-Year-Old Woman With Subcutaneous Nodule and Hilar Adenopathy]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1080?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shigemitsu, H., Yarbrough, C. A., Prakash, S., Sharma, O. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0127</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 65-Year-Old Woman With Subcutaneous Nodule and Hilar Adenopathy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1083</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1080</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE PEARLS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1084?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 24-Year-Old Man With Giddiness, Hemoptysis, and Skin Lesions]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1084?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pinto, L. M., Udwadia, Z. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0393</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 24-Year-Old Man With Giddiness, Hemoptysis, and Skin Lesions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1087</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1084</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE PEARLS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1088?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A 59-Year-Old Man With a 10-cm Lung Mass]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1088?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Molloy, C., Staples, E. D., Sriram, P. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0607</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A 59-Year-Old Man With a 10-cm Lung Mass]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1091</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1088</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE PEARLS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1092?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Critical Management Decisions in Patients With Acute Liver Failure]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1092?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Few admissions to the ICU present a greater clinical challenge than the patient with acute liver failure (ALF), the syndrome of abrupt loss of liver function in a previously unaffected individual. Although advances in the intensive care management of patients with ALF have improved survival, the prognosis of ALF remains poor, with a 33% mortality rate and a 25% liver transplant rate in the United States. ALF adversely affects nearly every organ system, with most deaths occurring from sepsis and subsequent multiorgan system failure, and cerebral edema, resulting in intracranial hypertension (ICH) and brainstem herniation. Unfortunately, the optimal management of ALF remains poorly defined, and practices are often based on local experience and case reports rather than on randomized, controlled clinical trials. The paramount question in any patient presenting with ALF remains defining an etiology, since specific antidotes can save lives and spare the liver. This article will consider recent advances in the assignment of an etiology, the administration of etiology-specific treatment to abate the liver injury, and the management of complications (<I>eg</I>, infection, cerebral edema, and the bleeding diathesis) in patients with ALF. New data on the administration of <I>N</I>-acetylcysteine to patients with non-acetaminophen ALF, the treatment of ICH, and assessment of the need for liver transplantation will also be presented.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stravitz, R. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1071</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Critical Management Decisions in Patients With Acute Liver Failure]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1102</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1092</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CONTEMPORARY REVIEWS IN CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1103?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Abstracts for Professional Meetings: Small But Mighty]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1103?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foote, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1589</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Abstracts for Professional Meetings: Small But Mighty]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1105</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1103</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>MEDICAL WRITING TIP OF THE MONTH</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1106?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[More Joy]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1106?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniels, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0983</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[More Joy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PECTORILOQUY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1106-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Some Questions]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1106-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coulehan, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1262</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Some Questions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1106</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1106</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PECTORILOQUY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1107?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Grading Improves Transparency and Quality]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1107?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, K. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1333</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Grading Improves Transparency and Quality]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1107</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1107-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Chaos of War]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1107-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hooper, R. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1513</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Chaos of War]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1107</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1108?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1108?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobin, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1837</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1108-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Estimating Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure From Systolic Pressure: A Caveat?]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1108-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kothari, S. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Estimating Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure From Systolic Pressure: A Caveat?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1108</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1108</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1109?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/5/1109?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chemla, D., Herve, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-11-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-1782</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1109</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1109</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CORRESPONDENCE</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/4_suppl/43S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anxiety and Depression in COPD: Current Understanding, Unanswered Questions, and Research Needs]]></title>
<link>http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/short/134/4_suppl/43S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st><I>Background:</I></st>
<p>Approximately 60 million people in the United States live with one of four chronic conditions: heart disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and major depression. Anxiety and depression are very common comorbidities in COPD and have significant impact on patients, their families, society, and the course of the disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Methods:</I></st>
<p>We report the proceedings of a multidisciplinary workshop on anxiety and depression in COPD that aimed to shed light on the current understanding of these comorbidities, and outline unanswered questions and areas of future research needs.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Results:</I></st>
<p>Estimates of prevalence of anxiety and depression in COPD vary widely but are generally higher than those reported in some other advanced chronic diseases. Untreated and undetected anxiety and depressive symptoms may increase physical disability, morbidity, and health-care utilization. Several patient, physician, and system barriers contribute to the underdiagnosis of these disorders in patients with COPD. While few published studies demonstrate that these disorders associated with COPD respond well to appropriate pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy, only a small proportion of COPD patients with these disorders receive effective treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st><I>Conclusion:</I></st>
<p>Future research is needed to address the impact, early detection, and management of anxiety and depression in COPD.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurer, J., Rebbapragada, V., Borson, S., Goldstein, R., Kunik, M. E., Yohannes, A. M., Hanania, N. A., for the ACCP Workshop Panel on Anxiety and Depression in COPD]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-08</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1378/chest.08-0342</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anxiety and Depression in COPD: Current Understanding, Unanswered Questions, and Research Needs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American College of Chest Physicians</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4 suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-10-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>43S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION IN COPD: CURRENT UNDERSTANDING, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>