Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
First published online on August 8, 2008
Chest, doi:10.1378/chest.08-1018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Byrne, P. M
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Byrne, P. M
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. J

Increasing doses of inhaled corticosteroids compared to adding long-acting inhaled β2-agonists in achieving asthma control.

Paul M O'Byrne, MB, FRCP(C)1; Ian P Naya2; Anders Kallen2; Dirkje S Postma, MD, PhD3 and Peter J Barnes, DM, DSc4

1Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 2AstraZeneca R&D, Lund, Sweden 3Department of Pulmonology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands 4National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

obyrnep{at}mcmaster.ca

Abstract

BackgroundCombination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β2-agonists (LABA), or treatment with high doses of ICS alone, improves asthma control when low-dose ICS is not sufficient. However, it is not known which of these treatment options is more effective in sustaining asthma control.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of increasing ICS versus adding LABA on time spent with well-controlled asthma or poorly controlled asthma.

MethodsPost hoc analysis of the Formoterol and Corticosteroid Establishing Therapy (FACET) study, which compared a four-fold increase in budesonide dose with and without formoterol.

ResultsTime with well-controlled asthma was improved by 19% (95% CI: 3–35%, p=0.017) by adding formoterol 24 µg.d–1 to budesonide 200 µg.d–1 compared to 2% (95% CI: –9–12%, p=0.76) with budesonide 800 µg.d–1 alone. Time with well-controlled asthma was further improved by 29% (95% CI: 13–47%, p<0.001) by adding formoterol to budesonide 800 µg d–1. Time with poorly controlled asthma was significantly reduced by the same interventions by 43% (95% CI: 25–57%), 22% (95% CI: 7–44%) and 50% (95% CI: 30–64%) respectively. Adding formoterol to budesonide was significantly more effective in increasing time with well-controlled asthma when compared to increasing the budesonide dose 4-fold (increase 16%: CI: 1–33%, p=0.035), with a trend for a greater reduction in time with poor control (decrease 21%; 95% CI: -5– 42%).

ConclusionThe addition of formoterol to low dose budesonide increases the probability of well-controlled asthma compared to a substantial increase in the dose of ICS.

Key Words: Asthma control • Long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) • Budesonide • Inhaled corticosteroids • Formoterol







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Chest Physicians.