Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Get CME credit for this article
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacIntyre, N. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacIntyre, N. R.
(Chest. 2005;128:561S-567S.)
© 2005 American College of Chest Physicians

Current Issues in Mechanical Ventilation for Respiratory Failure*

Neil R. MacIntyre, MD

* From the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to: Neil R. MacIntyre, MD, Clinical Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Room 7453 Duke Hospital, Box 3911 Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710; e-mail: neil.macintyre{at}duke.edumc

The morbidity and mortality associated with respiratory failure is, to a certain extent, iatrogenic. Mechanical ventilation, although the mainstay of treatment for respiratory distress syndrome, can result in physical trauma to lung tissue (ventilator-induced lung injury [VILI]). Strategies to alleviate VILI are often termed lung-protective strategies and are aimed at reducing overstretching and shear stresses associated with repetitive alveolar collapse and reopening. Lower tidal volumes during ventilation, maintenance of positive-end expiratory pressure, and high-frequency ventilation are the best-studied lung-protective strategies that appear to reduce VILI. Faster withdrawal from mechanical ventilation could also improve outcomes and lower the costs associated with care. To enhance the success of weaning from mechanical ventilation, the cooperative efforts of physicians and respiratory therapists are needed. These efforts involve the initiation of spontaneous-breathing trials, implementation of systematic weaning protocols, and optimization of individual patient interventions.

Key Words: mechanical ventilation • respiratory failure • ventilator-induced lung injury • weaning mechanical ventilation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. M. Kahn, L. Goitein, D. R. Ouellette, and R. S. Irwin
Pharmaceutical Industry Sponsorship of Journal Supplements
Chest, May 1, 2006; 129(5): 1387 - 1388.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Chest Physicians.