HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hirsh, J. Articles by Raschke, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hirsh, J. Articles by Raschke, R.

Heparin and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin

The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

Correspondence to: Jack Hirsh, CM, MD, FCCP, Henderson Research Centre, 711 Concession St, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada; e-mail: jhirsh{at}thrombosis.hhscr.org

This article about unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. UFH is a heterogeneous mixture of glycosaminoglycans that bind to antithrombin via a pentasaccharide, catalyzing the inactivation of thrombin and other clotting factors. UFH also binds endothelial cells, platelet factor 4, and platelets, leading to rather unpredictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Variability in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents necessitates site-specific validation of the aPTT therapeutic range in order to properly monitor UFH therapy. Lack of validation has been an oversight in many clinical trials comparing UFH to LMWH. In patients with apparent heparin resistance, anti-factor Xa monitoring may be superior to measurement of aPTT. LMWHs lack the nonspecific binding affinities of UFH, and, as a result, LMWH preparations have more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. LMWHs have replaced UFH for most clinical indications for the following reasons: (1) these properties allow LMWHs to be administered subcutaneously, once daily without laboratory monitoring; and (2) the evidence from clinical trials that LMWH is as least as effective as and is safer than UFH. Several clinical issues regarding the use of LMWHs remain unanswered. These relate to the need for monitoring with an anti-factor Xa assay in patients with severe obesity or renal insufficiency. The therapeutic range for anti-factor Xa activity depends on the dosing interval. Anti-factor Xa monitoring is prudent when administering weight-based doses of LMWH to patients who weigh > 150 kg. It has been determined that UFH infusion is preferable to LMWH injection in patients with creatinine clearance of < 25 mL/min, until further data on therapeutic dosing of LMWHs in renal failure have been published. However, when administered in low doses prophylactically, LMWH is safe for therapy in patients with renal failure. Protamine may help to reverse bleeding related to LWMH, although anti-factor Xa activity is not fully normalized by protamine. The synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux is a promising new antithrombotic agent for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Key Words: heparin • low-molecular-weight heparin • pentasaccharide

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Haas and A. C. Spyropoulos Primary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Long-Term Care: Identifying and Managing the Risk Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, April 1, 2008; 14(2): 149 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hirsh, M. O'Donnell, and J. W. Eikelboom Beyond Unfractionated Heparin and Warfarin: Current and Future Advances Circulation, July 31, 2007; 116(5): 552 - 560. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kearon, J. S. Ginsberg, J. A. Julian, M. Gent, and for the Fixed-Dose Heparin (FIDO) Investigators Fixed-Dose Unfractionated Heparin vs Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism--Reply JAMA, January 17, 2007; 297(3): 263 - 263. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tremey, B. Szekely, S. Schlumberger, D. Francois, N. Liu, K. Sievert, and M. Fischler Anticoagulation monitoring during vascular surgery: accuracy of the Hemochron(R) low range activated clotting time (ACT-LR) Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2006; 97(4): 453 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kearon, J. S. Ginsberg, J. A. Julian, J. Douketis, S. Solymoss, P. Ockelford, S. Jackson, A. G. Turpie, B. MacKinnon, J. Hirsh, et al. Comparison of fixed-dose weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism. JAMA, August 23, 2006; 296(8): 935 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Carson Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin vs low-molecular-weight heparin for acute thromboembolic disease: issues of efficacy and cost. JAMA, August 23, 2006; 296(8): 991 - 993. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. de Moerloose, C. M. Samama, and S. Motte Management of venous thromboembolism: [Traitement de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse]. Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(6_suppl): S80 - S88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Lim, F. Dentali, J. W. Eikelboom, and M. A. Crowther Meta-Analysis: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Bleeding in Patients with Severe Renal Insufficiency Ann Intern Med, May 2, 2006; 144(9): 673 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.E. Husted, B.K. Ziegler, and A. Kher Long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2006; 27(8): 913 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Manco-Johnson How I treat venous thrombosis in children Blood, January 1, 2006; 107(1): 21 - 29. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Sabatine, D. A. Morrow, G. Montalescot, M. Dellborg, J. L. Leiva-Pons, M. Keltai, S. A. Murphy, C. H. McCabe, C. M. Gibson, C. P. Cannon, et al. Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Fibrinolytics in the CLARITY-TIMI 28 Trial Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3846 - 3854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Prandoni How I treat venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4027 - 4033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Warkentin, R. J. Cook, V. J. Marder, J.-A. I. Sheppard, J. C. Moore, B. I. Eriksson, A. Greinacher, and J. G. Kelton Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies in orthopedic surgery patients receiving antithrombotic prophylaxis with fondaparinux or enoxaparin Blood, December 1, 2005; 106(12): 3791 - 3796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Aujesky, K. J. Smith, J. Cornuz, and M. S. Roberts Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1601 - 1610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: