|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From Critical Care and Respiratory Services (Dr. Colice), Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Pulmonary Division (Dr. Rubins), Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN; and Pulmonary Cancer Detection and Prevention Program (Dr. Unger), Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Correspondence to: Gene L. Colice, MD, FCCP, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St NW, Washington, DC 20010; e-mail: gxc{at}mhg.edu
The following two distinctly different issues should be taken into account when planning patient care following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer: adequate follow-up to manage complications related to the curative-intent therapy; and surveillance to detect recurrences of the primary lung cancer and/or development of a new primary lung cancer early enough to allow potentially curative retreatment. Follow-up for complications should be performed by the specialist responsible for the curative-intent therapy and should last 3 to 6 months. Recurrences of the original lung cancer will be more likely during the first 2 years after curative-intent therapy, but there will be an increased lifelong risk of approximately 1 to 2% per year of developing a metachronous, or new primary, lung cancer. A standard surveillance program for these patients is recommended based on periodic visits, with chest-imaging studies and counseling patients on symptom recognition. Whether subgroups of patients with a higher risk of developing a metachronous lung cancer (eg, those patients whose primary lung cancer was radiographically occult or central and those patients surviving for > 2 years after treatment for small cell lung cancer) should have a more intensive surveillance program is presently unclear. The surveillance program should be coordinated by a multidisciplinary tumor board and overseen by the physician who diagnosed and initiated therapy for the original lung cancer. Smoking cessation is recommended for all patients following curative-intent therapy for lung cancer.
Key Words: lung cancer metachronous tumors recurrence surveillance
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Lai Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Diagnosis of Recurrent Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2005; 80(6): 2346 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kent, P. Korn, J. L. Port, P. C. Lee, N. K. Altorki, and R. J. Korst Cost Effectiveness of Chest Computed Tomography After Lung Cancer Resection: A Decision Analysis Model Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1215 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Battafarano, S. D. Force, B. F. Meyers, J. Bell, T. J. Guthrie, J. D. Cooper, and G. A. Patterson Benefits of resection for metachronous lung cancer J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2004; 127(3): 836 - 842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fujimoto, T. Okazaki, T. Matsukura, T. Hanawa, N. Yamashita, K. Nishimura, M. Kuwabara, and Y. Matsubara Operation for lung cancer in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: surgical contraindication? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2003; 76(5): 1674 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |