HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Detterbeck, F. C. Articles by Silvestri, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Detterbeck, F. C. Articles by Silvestri, G. A.

Invasive Staging^*

The Guidelines

^* From the Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program (Dr. Detterbeck), Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Dr. DeCamp), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (Dr. Kohman), SUNY Health Science Center, Syracuse, NY; and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Silvestri), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Correspondence to: Frank C. Detterbeck, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7065, 108 Burnett-Womack Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7065; e-mail: fdetter{at}med.unc.edu

A variety of invasive staging tests are available, including mediastinoscopy, thoracoscopy (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery), transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA), and endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-NA). Each of these tests requires specific skills, has particular risks, and has technical considerations making it more or less suitable for masses in particular locations. Therefore, direct comparisons among the tests are not possible, and the issue is to define which procedure is most useful for a particular situation. Invasive staging procedures are sometimes used to confirm the stage of a lung cancer, ie, when radiographic staging is not reliable. However, invasive staging procedures are also often used to confirm the diagnosis (ie, when the radiographic stage is reliable). The first situation requires a test with a low false-negative rate; the latter requires a test with high sensitivity. Clinicians must be clear about the question at hand and how to assess the value of a test when selecting an invasive staging procedure. When confirmation of the diagnosis is the primary issue, TBNA (or EUS-NA, if available) are good choices because of high sensitivity and low morbidity. When the primary issue is to confirm that there is no involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes, mediastinoscopy appears to be best suited to most situations. When the primary goal is to confirm malignant involvement of mediastinal nodes, mediastinoscopy also appears to be best in general, although TBNA, TTNA, and EUS-NA may be reasonable alternatives in certain situations. However, selection of a test will also depend on the local availability of expertise, and patient-specific anatomic and physiologic considerations. Selection of the optimal approach is best achieved through a multidisciplinary discussion so that all aspects can be weighed appropriately.

Key Words: anterior mediastinotomy • bronchoscopy • clinical staging • esophageal ultrasound • mediastinal lymph nodes • mediastinoscopy • pathologic staging • staging • transbronchial needle aspiration • transthoracic needle aspiration

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Bandi, W. Lunn, A. Ernst, R. Eberhardt, H. Hoffmann, and F. J. F. Herth Ultrasound vs CT in Detecting Chest Wall Invasion by Tumor: A Prospective Study Chest, April 1, 2008; 133(4): 881 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. M. Patel, A. Pohlman, A. Husain, I. Noth, J. B. Hall, and J. P. Kress Conventional Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Decreases the Rate of Surgical Sampling of Intrathoracic Lymphadenopathy Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 773 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. C. Detterbeck Relearning the Lessons of the Past: Are We Making Progress? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1979 - 1980. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Eloubeidi, A. Tamhane, V. K. Chen, and R. J. Cerfolio Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Prior Negative Mediastinoscopy Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1231 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Annema, M. I. Versteegh, M. Veselic, L. Welker, T. Mauad, J. K. Sont, L. N. A. Willems, and K. F. Rabe Endoscopic Ultrasound Added to Mediastinoscopy for Preoperative Staging of Patients With Lung Cancer JAMA, August 24, 2005; 294(8): 931 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kuzdzal, M. Zielinski, B. Papla, A. Szlubowski, L. Hauer, T. Nabialek, W. Sosnicki, and J. Pankowski Transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy--the new operative technique and early results in lung cancer staging Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 384 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Eloubeidi, R. J. Cerfolio, V. K. Chen, R. Desmond, S. Syed, and B. Ojha Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Mediastinal Lymph Node in Patients With Suspected Lung Cancer After Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Scans Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Jacobson, M. K. Gould, G. A. Silvestri, F. Detterbeck, A. Papagiannis, A. Buyukcelik, B. Yalcin, G. Utkan, A. Spira, and D. S. Ettinger Multidisciplinary Management of Lung Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., May 6, 2004; 350(19): 2008 - 2010. [Full Text] [PDF]