Chest
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, M. G.
(Chest. 2000;117:38S-41S.)
© 2000 American College of Chest Physicians

How Can the Implementation of Guidelines Be Improved?*

Michael G. Pearson, MA, FRCP

* From Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College

Correspondence to: Michael G. Pearson, MA, FRCP, Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK; e-mail: Michael.Pearson{at}rcplondon.ac.uk

Guidelines for a variety of diseases have now been produced. However, implementation of guidelines requires that the medical profession is willing to conform to patterns of diagnostic and treatment behavior set down by others. This may not happen in practice. Early experience in the United Kingdom was gained with the introduction of guidelines for the management of asthma. For a number of years, there have been improvements in practice, but deficiencies still exist. When the introduction of guidelines for the management of COPD was planned, a new approach was taken with a consortium of the British Thoracic Society, pharmaceutical companies, and medical equipment companies being formed to promote their use. Early studies show that COPD care starts from an even lower baseline than asthma; there is poor understanding of objective diagnosis of COPD in both primary and secondary care.

Key Words: clinical guidelines • COPD • spirometry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
A. L. Fuhlbrigge, S. T. Weiss, K. M. Kuntz, A. D. Paltiel, and for the CAMP Research Group
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Percentage Improves the Classification of Severity Among Children With Asthma
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): e347 - e355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. Timmermans and A. Mauck
The Promises And Pitfalls Of Evidence-Based Medicine
Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 18 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Chest Physicians.