Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belani, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belani, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bennett, C. L.
(Chest. 1998;113:78S-85S.)
© 1998 American College of Chest Physicians

Treating Malignant Pleural Effusions Cost Consciously

Chandra P. Belani MD1; Tammy S. Pajeau MS1; and Charles L. Bennett MD, PhD1

1 From the Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; and the Lakeside Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago

Malignant pleural effusions are associated with significant morbidity. Prompt clinical evaluation followed by aggressive treatment often results in successful palliation. This report summarizes the traditional and experimental approaches used in the management of malignant pleural effusion and provides an attempt at analysis of cost comparison and resource utilization associated with the use of various sclerosing agents. The standard sclerotherapy for malignant pleural effusions has routinely been performed as an inpatient procedure using a large-bore chest tube for drainage and instillation of a sclerosing agent. Use of a small-bore catheter for drainage and pleurodesis is associated with reduced patient discomfort and appears to be feasible and equally efficacious in the ambulatory setting. Results with the ambulatory procedure are preliminary but promising. Future comparisons with the traditional approach will allow therapy to be based not only on efficacy, but also on the use and expense of related resources.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians.