Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonomi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonomi, P.
(Chest. 1998;113:13S-16S.)
© 1998 American College of Chest Physicians

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Experience With Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Philip Bonomi MD1

1 From the Section of Medical Oncology, Rush Medical College, Chicago

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) investigators have tested a variety of single-agent and combination regimens in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the last 2 decades. The following observations have been made. (1) The mitomycin/vinblastine/cisplatin regimen produced a trend for higher response rates in two studies and a significantly higher response rate in a third study. Survival, however, tended to be shorter in patients receiving this regimen. (2) Carboplatin produced a 9% overall response rate and a median survival of 31.7 weeks, which was slightly but significantly longer than the median survivals obtained with three combination chemotherapy regimens. (3) Paclitaxel produced an overall response rate of 21% and a 1-year survival rate of 40% in previously untreated NSCLC patients. This observation led to a phase III trial in which paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 and 250 mg/m2) was combined with cisplatin and compared with etoposide/cisplatin. Response rates for each of the paclitaxel/cisplatin regimens (26% for 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 31% for 250 mg/m2) were significantly higher than the response rate for etoposide/cisplatin (12%), but response between the two paclitaxel/cisplatin arms was not significantly different. At this point, there is a trend toward longer survival in each of the paclitaxel/cisplatin arms, but the final survival analyses have not been completed. In the next phase III trial, ECOG will evaluate paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) plus cisplatin in comparison to three other regimens—docetaxel/cisplatin, gemcitabine/cisplatin, and carboplatin/paclitaxel.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians.